Some developers like Twitter Bootstrap CSS because it allows for the publication of a new site or app in a relatively short period of time on a small budget. Thanks to a variety of templates, responsive design and compatibility, there are plenty who sing the praises of Twitter Bootstrap.

But it’s not for everyone. Some have noted the loading time of Bootstrap websites and the inevitability of Bootstrap sites looking like others since they use the same templates. Plus, Bootstrap doesn’t employ best practices. If you fall into the “I’m-looking-for-alternatives-to-Twitter-Bootstrap” camp, here are seven options to consider.

7 Alternatives to Twitter Bootstrap for Web Designers

1. Skeleton: Better Features

A common complaint against Bootstrap is users pay for a bunch of features that are never used by basic sites. As the name would suggest, Skeleton is the way to go if you want just a few standard elements to get started. Skeleton is a good option for small projects and offers enough HTML elements to get started.

2. Base: Unique Design Elements

Some see Bootstrap’s design options as one of its greatest strengths. Others see it as a weakness, since sites may end up looking too similar. If you fall into the latter camp, try Base, which is built on top of LESS and SASS and, thanks to its pared-down format, allows developers to add custom themes and design elements.

3. Tuktuk: Less Heavy

For those worried about loading times with Bootstrap sites, try Tuktuk. The much lighter Tuktuk uses a column system and offers only the number of components needed to build out a good-looking website.

4. CardinalCSS: Building for Mobile First

If your client is mostly mobile-minded, check out CardinalCSS, which bill itself as a “modular, ‘mobile-first’ CSS framework built with performance and scalability in mind.” CardinalCSS doesn’t offer many of the bells and whistles of Twitter Bootstrap, but that makes for a much lighter site.

5. Zimit: Uniformity Across all Web Browsers

Tired of complaints about sites not working across all web browsers? Try Zimit, an open source, LESS-based project that provides uniformity whether users are accessing your site via Chrome, Firefox, Opera, Safari or Internet Explorer.

6. Mueller: Plays Well With Others

Sometimes developers aren’t creating a site from scratch. Sometimes they are called on in the middle of a project and can’t rely on Twitter Bootstrap to be the bridge over troubled waters. Javascript, HTML and CSS can all create conflicts within Bootstrap. Instead, try Mueller, a responsive modular grid system for both responsive and non-responsive designs based on Compass that can be used with Masonry Javascript.

7. ConciseCSS: Supports SASS

Twitter Bootstrap is built with LESS, so there is no support for SASS or Compass. Want an alternative? ConciseCSS encourages developers to “give up the bloat” and “accomplish more with less” by offering a product that includes supports for SASS and Vanilla CSS.

There are many benefits to using Twitter Bootstrap, but many developers are also looking for alternatives based on the needs of their clients. These seven alternatives may be just the solution you’ve been looking for.

Image: Personal Creations